What is the difference between FSC and PEFC chain of custody?

Both systems track certified timber through the supply chain, but differ in approach: FSC CoC requires strict physical separation or percentage-based systems with minimum thresholds; PEFC CoC allows physical separation, percentage-based, or credit systems with different minimum percentages. FSC has more prescriptive requirements for controlled wood (non-certified material mixed with certified); PEFC has a simpler due diligence approach.

Both systems track certified timber through the supply chain, but differ in approach: FSC CoC requires strict physical separation or percentage-based systems with minimum thresholds; PEFC CoC allows physical separation, percentage-based, or credit systems with different minimum percentages. FSC has more prescriptive requirements for controlled wood (non-certified material mixed with certified); PEFC has a simpler due diligence approach. FSC is generally considered more rigorous and is preferred by environmental NGOs; PEFC has broader global coverage (more certified forest area). Many organisations hold both certifications simultaneously to serve all customer requirements.

Why this matters

This question relates to Chain of Custody Explained: From Forest to Construction Site, which covers the broader topic in detail. Understanding this specific aspect helps architects, builders, and timber dealers make informed specification decisions.

For full context and additional technical detail, see our comprehensive guide:

→ Chain of Custody Explained: From Forest to Construction Site

Related questions

• What is chain of custody certification for timber?
• Do I need chain of custody certification to sell timber?
• How much does chain of custody certification cost?

About this answer

This answer is part of the PuurModulair Knowledge Base — comprehensive timber specification guidance for architects, builders, and dealers across the UK, EU, and Scandinavia.