sustainability · Answer
Does timber have a lower carbon footprint than concrete?
Quick Answer
Yes. Structural timber has significantly lower embodied carbon than reinforced concrete.
Does timber have a lower carbon footprint than concrete?
Yes. Structural timber has significantly lower embodied carbon than reinforced concrete.
Yes. Structural timber has significantly lower embodied carbon than reinforced concrete. A typical reinforced concrete frame has embodied carbon of 400–600 kgCO₂e/m² of floor area, while an equivalent timber frame achieves 100–200 kgCO₂e/m². The difference is primarily due to cement production (responsible for ~8% of global CO₂ emissions) and the carbon sequestration benefit of timber.
Why this matters
This question relates to Carbon Footprint of European Timber vs Steel vs Concrete, which covers the broader topic in detail. Understanding this specific aspect helps architects, builders, and timber dealers make informed specification decisions.
For full context and additional technical detail, see our comprehensive guide:
→ Carbon Footprint of European Timber vs Steel vs Concrete
Related questions
- How much CO₂ does timber sequester per cubic metre?
- What is the embodied carbon of structural timber compared to steel?
- What is an EPD and why does it matter for timber?
About this answer
This answer is part of the PuurModulair Knowledge Base — comprehensive timber specification guidance for architects, builders, and dealers across the UK, EU, and Scandinavia.
Read the Full Guide
Carbon Footprint of European Timber vs Steel vs Concrete
Lifecycle carbon analysis of structural timber compared to steel and concrete. Embodied carbon data, sequestration calculations, EPD references, and practical guidance for low-carbon structural design.
Read full guideRelated Questions
Need a tailored answer?
Speak to a timber specialist
Get a project-specific specification from our technical team within one working day.
Request Quote